Author: admin

  • Declaration on the Sex-Based Rights of Women
    endorsed this evening by Georgia Green Party

    To: Womens Human Rights Campaign

    It is my distinct privilege and pleasure to report the action of the state committee of the Georgia Green Party on its phone conference this evening, to endorse the Declaration on the Sex-Based Rights of Women.

    I have attached a copy of the resolution, in the form in which it was adopted by the state committee, along with a copy of our state party logo for your use in publicizing our state party’s support for your efforts.

    If I may answer any questions you may have about our party’s support for your work, please do not hesitate to write or call.

    Thank you for the important leadership you have shown on these questions. Please let us know how we can work with you further to advance this vital work.

    — Hugh Esco, Secretary
    Georgia Green Party

    https://www.womensdeclaration.com/

    Declaration_on_Sex_Based_Rights_of_Women-provide_for_party_endorsement-as_passed

    Declaration_on_Womens_Sex_Based_Rights_2019

    Declaration_on_Womens_Sex_Based_Rights_2019-summary

  • User Acceptance Testing

    You are encouraged to test this form, but not to rely on it to actually process a contribution to the party.  It is currently wired to a test credit card processor, and will not process a real debit card.  I would appreciate hearing from folks about how this works for you.  If you have any feedback on the user experience provided by this service, please send an email.

    For your tests, please use as your debit card, 4242-4242-4242-4242 (only without the hyphens).  Choose any card expiration date in the future and any three or four digit cvc code.

    [php_everywhere]

  • 2019 Annual Convention of Georgia Green Party called

    In the last meeting of the state committee, called by Bruce Dixon in his capacity as Co-Chair of the Georgia Green Party, its members were unanimously agreed in his absence, on the adoption of a Dixon resolution to call this year’s annual meeting of the party. By the time we gathered a quorum of the state committee to hear the proposal, Bruce had been sedated for two days, and would make his departure early the next afternoon.

    Greens from across the state are urged to gather, Saturday, August 17th, from 10:00 am until 4:00 pm at the Arts Xchange in East Point Georgia, 2148 Newnan Street; 30344. We will meet in the Ebon Dooley Studio, elect members of the state committee and our national delegation and consider proposed changes to the state party bylaws and the platforms of the state and national parties.

  • Party mourns loss, celebrates life and work of Claudia Ellquist

    Claudia Ellquist, a delegate to the National Committee and two time Green Party candidate for County Attorney in Pima County Arizona, died Sunday, November 18th, 2018 at the age of 70. Party activists were alerted by a forwarded email from her husband of twenty-four years, John Yoakum.

    She is remembered by her colleagues among the national party leadership as thoughtful, as ‘a great leader, penetrating in her analysis, caring about others, and a pillar of strength for the Green Party’, as ‘(o)ne of the wisest, (most) intelligent and compassionate people I have had the opportunity to know’, as ‘a voice of reason and kindness (who) will be missed by all’, for ‘her personal calm’ and reasonableness, for her insight and compassion.

    Claudia Ellquist was a member of the National Women’s Caucus of the Green Party of the United States, and served as a Delegate for the Arizona Green Party to the Green National Committee. She served at the time of her death, as the First Vice Chair of the Arizona Green Party.  Ellquist ran four times for Pima County Attorney, twice as a Green, in 2004 receiving 23,028 votes for 7.64% of the total vote and in 2008 earning 22,747 votes for 6.31% of the total. Her campaigns supported her work to abolish the death penalty.

    She led the host committee which brought the Annual Meeting of the Green Party of the United States to Tuscon Arizona in 2006. During the event she organized a tour of her church which was a center for organizing in solidarity with immigrants risking a desert crossing on their journey North. She described the battles between her congregation, which stages in the desert, water for migrants and the vigilantes who would poison the water or just as deadly, puncture the containers, wasting the water into the desert sand.

    Writing of Kavanaugh, in a recent op-ed (and here) meant to convey the appreciation of the National Women’s Caucus of the Green Party of the United States for the testimony before the Senate Judiciary by Professor Christine Blasey Ford, Claudia Ellquist wrote:

    “If he had Come to Jesus decades ago, confessing himself — not waiting, closeted, for an accusation — about what he almost did, and, as significantly, what he did. Then he would have had time to turn his life around, to see women as real human beings, and to see fear and hurt and harm for what they are. But our society abandoned him too, not teaching him to take responsibility, or even believe that there was responsibility to take.”

    Delegates to the Green National Committee from both Delaware and Kansas report that this quote of Claudia, hangs on their walls.

    “People who disagree with you are not your enemies. Only people who try to dominate you are your enemies. Learning the difference can make us all so much more effective.”

    – Claudia Ellquist

    Quoting from her obituary, “(Claudia Ellquist) was born in Duluth, Minnesota . . . then mov(ed) extensively with her military family to numerous places including Japan. She moved to Tucson (Arizona) in 1962.  Claudia graduated from Palo Verde High School, University of Arizona and University of Arizona Law School in 1976. That time included a two year church stay in San Francisco for a Lutheran and Episcopal church mission. Claudia spent a brief time practicing law and 40+ years on community activism, including church activities, women’s organization and the Green Party. . . . She ran for Pima County Attorney four times in order to highlight the elimination of the death penalty as a public issue. . . . She organized NOW chapters at the city, county and state levels and served on the national board of directors for NOW.  Claudia was an original member of the Arizona Clean Elections Commission, first appointed by the Arizona Legislature in 1999. She has worked tirelessly with Church Women United (CWU), Disciples Women’s Fellowship, and First Christian Church. She has received a cash award from the Tucson Festival of Books or her writing in the category of non-fiction memoir. She successfully organized the county-wide effort to recall the Pima County Tax Assessor in 1994. Claudia subsequently organized volunteer efforts to pass Healthy Arizona I (Prop 203) and Healthy Arizona II (Prop 204) which successfully brought Medicaid to the state after 30 years without it.  .  .  .  In lieu of flowers, people are encouraged to work for passage of the ERA or (to make) a charitable donation to NOW or to the charity of their choice.   A memorial Service will be held at First Christian Church, 740 E Speedway, on Saturday, December 1st at 11am.”

    Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji’un.

  • Cooper Shows Well in Canvas of Write-in Votes

    Congratulations to Jimmy Cooper are in order for an excellent write-in showing. He showed stronger results than our entire 1998 slate, or if memory serves, any other of our candidates except Nan Garrett and our Presidential slates.

    http://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/2018_votes_cast_for_certified_write-in_candidates

    ‘Legislated off the ballot’, as Party Chairman Bruce Dixon often puts it, the Georgia Green Party was left to run the two candidates of its 2018 slate as write-ins. John Fortuin turned his attention elsewhere, to media work and research (see his report on cronyism in Georgia election policy, mentioned in the previous issue). But Jimmy Cooper was undeterred by the ballot access barriers and proceeded with his Fall campaign. His work was visible in the results.

    To summarize, the Secretary certified results including a total of 564 votes for Green Party nominee Jimmy Cooper for Georgia’s 8th Congressional District. Those numbers include: 244 votes from Bibb County, 108 votes from Lowndes County, 134 votes from Houston County and 78 votes from the other nineteen counties combined.

    Only one write-in candidate showed a stronger finish in this year’s results, Emily Leslie delivered 600 write-ins in her bid for House District #106.

     

  • Let a hundred Georgia Green candidates bloom this Spring for 2020

    2020 is a Presidential Election year, and the Georgia Green Party will have the opportunity to nominate 16 candidates for the Electoral College. But to do so it must deliver 54,431 valid signatures.  Signature collection can begin on April 15th 2019, three and a half months from now.

    Contested primaries build parties.

    If we had 100 Green candidates across the state contesting for sixteen seats in the Electoral College, each committed to collecting 1,000 signatures before December 31st, 2019, we’d have secured the ability of our state party’s 2020 convention to nominate its candidates for statewide office by convention; and geared up to work for the ballot access of a slate of local candidates starting January 9th, 2020. A successful petition drive will also permit us to nominate candidates in the state-wide US Senate and PSC races scheduled for 2020.

    If you’d be interested in participating in this ballot access strategy, to put Green candidates for public office on Georgia’s ballot in 2020, please let our state party officers know, by writing the address below, and watch for announcements of upcoming materials and programs designed to support those actions you take to create a visible presence for the Green Party in your own community.

    Please write: ggp@georgiagreenparty.org

     

  • Election Clearly Stolen from Georgia Voters

    Greens welcome Abrams stand for election integrity, concerned for scope
    Green candidate documents cronyism in Kemp’s mismanagement of Georgia elections

    “This election was clearly stolen from the Georgia voters, in a campaign of a thousand cuts and involving at least outgoing Secretary Kemp. Undoubtedly, private profit is in there somewhere,” said Bruce Dixon, cochair of the Georgia Green Party and managing editor of Black Agenda Report. “Kemp acknowledges the inherent conflict of interest in a person certifying their own election with his own resignation. It was only after he had managed as Secretary of State his own election as Governor that he took this step. How more clear can he make it that his own integrity and the integrity of the election, the legitimacy of its results were never a real concern for him.”

    Over the past few years Brian Kemp has purged hundreds of thousands of voters from the rolls. This cycle alone he closed over two hundred polling places, mostly in precincts where republican candidates have performed poorly. He has restricted early voting opportunities. Some 50,000 new voter registrations submitted to his office have simply disappeared. A variety of tactics resulted in hundreds of thousands of voters being obligated to use second class provisional ballots, which state law requires be subsequently defended by having the voter show up a second time to resolve questions related to their identity and registration.

    “We welcome the attention of the blue team to the critical issue of voter suppression. We have much work to do if we want to operate our elections with the integrity necessary that they can serve as a means for naming a legitimate government with a popular mandate,” said John Fortuin, commenting on the pending litigation and the Democrat Gubernatorial nominee’s statements that she would not concede this week’s election. “We welcome Abrams’ insistence on an accurate vote count. We also urge her to stand firm against the pressures which will be brought to bear as we call out the theft of this election.”

    John Fortuin is a co-founder of Defenders of Democracy and a candidate this year for the Georgia Assembly in Senate District #46 (Walton, Oconee and Clarke Counties), a nominee of the Georgia Green Party. He is a certified write-in candidate for the 2018 general election. His status as a write-in candidate is due to a 75 year old voter suppression scheme enacted in 1943 by Democrats elected by the all-white primaries of the day. The initial intent of their rules was to deny black veterans access to the ballot in Georgia’s General Election. These rules continue to keep important voices, independent of corporate wealth, off of the ballot in Georgia.

    Previously, Democrat candidates have turned a blind eye to opportunities to fight for the right of voters to have the intent expressed on their ballots honored by the certified results of elections; and in Georgia have actively opposed Green Party initiatives to reform the ballot access barriers.

    In 2004, in Ohio and New Mexico, witness reports gave rise to concerns that the election had been subverted and that the results would not represent voter intent, that the election results had been compromised. Results that year showed irregularities that were not credible, based on statistics and reports from voters and elections observers. The Green Party’s Cobb-LaMarche campaign launched recounts in both states. The reports generated by the Green Party recount effort led to an investigation by the minority caucus in House Judiciary and became the basis for the first challenge to the seating of an electoral college delegation in the history of the country. The challenge was rejected and the Republican delegation was seated for Ohio based on compromised results, changing the outcome of the election. Ohio Green Party’s former nominee for Governor, journalist and now attorney Bob Fritakas, continued the investigation, and the evidence compiled by Greens led to the prosecution, conviction and incarceration of multiple Ohio election officials, but not the revisiting of the tainted election results in a closely divided state, which changed the outcome of a national election.

    Likewise in 2016, when Greens identified voter suppression issues in Pennsylvania and two other states, Jill Stein, the party’s Presidential candidate for a second cycle, mobilized her campaign to raise and spend millions of dollars to initiate recounts, which appeared likely to show evidence of significant election fraud. The Clinton campaign sent an observer, but otherwise stood by and watched judges appointed by Democrat and Republican administrations shut down the effort, again changing the outcome of the national election.

    “Greens and Democrats may disagree on some points of public policy. That does not mean we think it is ok when the will of Georgia voters is subverted to deny their preferred candidate a place in a run-off, or perhaps an outright majority. I urge that the Abrams campaign stand firm; and break from her party’s pattern of conceding defeat in the face of victory,” said Fortuin. A long time election integrity advocate, Fortuin has just published a new report, “Brian Kemp: Like his Democratic Predecessors, Suppressing Ballot Integrity and the Legitimacy of Georgia’s Elections”.

    Fortuin’s report contextualizes the finding of Federal Judge Amy Totenberg of Georgia’s Northern District in her recent Order, that “State election officials had buried their heads in the sand… [on known computerized voting vulnerabilities]”. The report documents the revolving door relationships between state election officials and richly rewarded private contractors doing business with the office of the Secretary of State, to provide for the administration of public elections.

    “The Green Party has been raising the alarm on these critical election integrity issues since at least 2003,” said John Fortuin. That year Party activists served in a leadership role with the Voter Choice Coalition, a multi-partisan coalition originally organized to work for reform to Georgia’s ballot access barriers. Coalition participants worked to require that the Diebold machines produce a voter verified paper ballot, which computer scientists understood even then, as the minimum standard for election integrity.

    Greens have a long history of supporting voting integrity issues, and welcome this focus on ‘voter suppression’ by a Democratic party candidate. “But we must demand more,” said Dixon, state party chairman and Cobb County resident. “Abrams must broaden her perspective on voter suppression to embrace the need to replace faith-based computerized voting with paper ballots, to enact automatic, permanent voter registration, to provide for publicly funded election campaigns, to end the abuse of the reapportionment process to deny voters contested races among competing perspectives, to tear down the barriers to ballot access used to deny voters an opportunity to vote for the candidates of their choice, to end the exclusion of otherwise qualified candidates from the public airwaves, news reports, polls and debates. These mechanisms deny voters information about our options and are fundamentally anti-democratic. The coming years will provide us an opportunity to see if Abrams concerns for voter suppression are serious or simply motivated by her own short term partisan interests. There is plenty of this agenda she can contribute to.”

    “Even with all the legitimate critiques of Stacey Abrams’ track record and her silence on crucial issues, there is something to be said about her fight for a fair election in Georgia,” said Andrea Merida, a cochair of the Green Party of the United States. “Gillum concedes Florida, Clinton ignored evidence of flagrant 2016 violations in battleground states, Gore abandoned the field in 2000. We do not generally expect this from her Party, but Abrams is right to fight, not just for herself, not just for Black women, but for all voters in Georgia.”

    — 30 —

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Friday, November 9th, 2018

    For further information, please contact:
    Bruce Dixon 404-797-2087; bdixon@georgiagreenparty.org
    John Fortuin 706-534-6001; info@FortuinForGeorgia.com

  • Yes on B — allow non profits serving mentally disabled to leverage anticipated federal tax credits to secure private sector financing for construction and renovations

    Statewide Referendum B
    Provides a tax exemption for certain homes for the mentally disabled.

    Controlling legislation: HB-196 * HB-196-AP

    Does the ballot question and measure name accurately and fully reflect the effect of passage without obfuscation?

    Yes.

    Who would benefit from the proposed change?

    Non-profit corporations which can access federal tax credits for the provision of residential services for the mentally disabled would be able to established a Limited Liability Corporation, wholly controlled by the non-profit; and use that LLC to contract with a for-profit corporation to finance the construction or renovation of a residential facility to serve the mentally disabled. These changes to the law, would permit the federal tax credits to be used to retire the debt to the for-profit corporation which provided financing. Significantly, and requiring the assent of the voters, the involvement of that for-profit company in the financing of that work, and the indirect ownership through the use of the LLC would not disqualify the non-profit company from claiming the ad-valorem tax exemptions to which they would otherwise be entitled for their work to provide housing to the mentally disabled.

    Who supports the passage of this measure?

    Who supports the defeat of this measure?

    What is the Georgia Green Party’s recommended position?

    The Georgia Green Party urges a YES vote on Referendum B.

  • No on A — reject effort to deny Atlanta residents notice, hearing for millage rate increases

    Statewide Referendum A — Urging a NO vote
    Provides for a homestead exemption for residents of certain municipal corporations.

    Controlling Legislation: HB-820 * HB-820-AP

    Does the ballot question and measure name accurately and fully reflect the effect of passage without obfuscation?

    No. First, the provisions of this measure are narrowly drawn to apply only to the city of Atlanta. Neither the question title, nor the ballot question makes clear that adoption of this state wide referendum would exempt the city of Atlanta from notice and hearing requirements related to any proposal to raise the millage rate applied to property values to compute ad-valorem taxes.

    Who would benefit from the proposed change?

    The city of Atlanta will be relieved of certain public participation requirements related to notice and hearings when considering a millage rate increase. Although the details are difficult to discern, supposedly some municipal property tax payers in Atlanta will benefit from an additional exemption of their primary residence for properties less than five acres.

    Who supports the passage of this measure?

    Who supports the defeat of this measure?

    What is the Georgia Green Party’s recommended position?

    The Georgia Green Party urges a NO vote on Referendum A.

  • Yes on Five — facilitate SPLOST for educational purposes in counties with multiple school districts

    2018_ballot_questions_yes_on_5

    CA #5 — Urging a YES vote
    Authorizes Fair Allocation of Sales Tax Proceeds to County and City School Districts

    Constitutional Amendment: SR-95 * SR-95-AP

    Enabling Legislation: implementation will be by local school boards

    Does the ballot question and measure name accurately and fully reflect the effect of passage without obfuscation?

    Question name suggests that the current formulation is not fair, but a per-capita allocation based on full time enrollment of students seems to be an appropriate means for the distribution of educational sales taxes. We find that the ballot name is predujicial in its framing, but that the ballot question itself accurately reflects the effect of passage.

    Who would benefit from the proposed change?

    Passage would permit school boards representing a majority of the students in a county’s school systems to put the question to the voters of imposing a tax, without the cooperation of other school districts in the county which serve a minority of the county’s students. The existing language in this Constitutional provision, which would continue to govern were #5 defeated on November 6th, requires universal agreement among all school systems in a county in order to ask the voters to impose such a tax.

    Concerns have been raised that this would permit the larger school systems in a county to impose their will on the smaller systems in a county; and that the agreement of prior school boards for a distribution formula in lieu of a per-capita allocation would bind the hands of future school boards.

    An existing provision of the state Constitution limits such local sales taxes for educational purposes to a term of five or fewer years, unless re-authorized. Given that protection, the concerns raised above are minimized.

    Who supports the passage of this measure?

    Who supports the defeat of this measure?

    What is the Georgia Green Party’s recommended position?

    The Georgia Green Party urges a YES vote on Constitutional Amendment #5.